The Possibilities and Limitations of Receivership for New York City Jails
While judicial receivers for prisons and jails are no panacea, they can improve conditions markedly
From escalating rates of violence, to a willful suppression of information by the Department of Correction (DOC), New York City’s jails are nothing short of a humanitarian crisis. Are we past the point of no return? With the federal monitor overseeing Rikers recently recommending that the Adams administration and DOC be held in contempt, and the United States Attorney now joining the calls for a receiver, the city is at a pivotal point about the future of NYC’s jails, and whether it is time for a new power to govern the jail system.
Vital City, Columbia Law School, CUNY Institute for State & Local Governance (ISLG) and Campaign Zero will bring together experts with deep experience working in the criminal justice system for a virtual event to assess what it takes to govern the jails and maintain the crucially important role of oversight.
Introduction
1. Setting the stage - Elizabeth Glazer, founder of Vital City (transcript)
2. Lessons on receivership in correctional settings - Hernandez Stroud, senior counsel for the Brennan Center for Justice (transcript)
Panel 1. What does it take to govern the jails? (45 mins)
Does the city have either the capacity or the will to implement the reforms necessary to make the jails both decent and humane? This panel will look at the drivers of dysfunction, what the city could do to address the crises in the jails and the risks and rewards of placing NYC jails in receivership.
-Moderator: Jan Ransom, The New York Times
-Stanley Brezenoff, former first deputy mayor of NYC, former chair of NYC Board of Correction
-Michael Jacobson, director of CUNY ISLG, former NYC DOC Commissioner
-Sara Norman, managing attorney at Prison Law Project in California, plaintiffs’ attorneys in suit that successfully installed receiver to deliver medical care in California prisons
-Hernandez Stroud, senior counsel for the Brennan Center for Justice
Panel 2. Death in darkness: why oversight matters (45 mins)
City government has taken ever more brazen steps to suppress information about what is happening in its jails, including crippling the power and access of its oversight board and refusing to release information to the press or public on whether deaths are occurring. This panel will explore why transparency, whether achieved through oversight bodies, the media or other means, is key to the decent operation of a jail. Panelists will explore what we can learn about the value of transparency or lack thereof from the long history of consent decrees in other contexts, such as police departments.
-Moderator: Errol Louis, NY1
-Christy Lopez, professor at Georgetown University Law School, previously led section at DOJ responsible for police department consent decrees
-Martha King, senior program officer at the Charles H. Revson Foundation, former Executive Director NYC Board of Correction
-Graham Rayman, reporter for the New York Daily News
-Stanley Richards, deputy CEO at Fortune Society, former first deputy commissioner NYC DOC
-Sarena Townsend, partner at Townsend, Mottola & Uris Law, former Deputy Commissioner of Investigation & Trials, NYC DOC
Closing Remarks
Michael Jacobson, director of CUNY ISLG, former NYC DOC Commissioner
For data on violence in the jails, go here.
For more information on previous events Vital City has hosted on the topic of receivership and the crises on Rikers Island, go here and here.